 |
| Sunrise in Banlung, Ratanakriri province, Cambodia |
For the last two weeks of January, I traveled with my CEDAC colleagues to Siem Reap and Ratanakiri provinces to visit projects and attend meetings. While I was happy to have another free day to visit the temples again in Siem Reap, I was mostly looking forward to finally seeing Ratanakiri, the exotic-sounding northeast province famed for its weather, natural beauty and diverse numbers of ethnic minorities. After I had been blown away in Mondulkiri over the Water Festival holiday--I hadn't realized that Cambodia had such a varied landscape with that much forest remaining--and I had high expectations. And while it was certainly an eye-opening and illuminating experience, unfortunately I wouldn't call it a particularly pleasant one.
All my life I've had a certain sensitivity to environmental issues, especially deforestation. I'm not sure why, but there are few things more depressing to me than the prospect of almost all global forests being wiped out in the next 30 years. Its gotten to the point where I can't even watch Planet Earth: the inevitable 'but their fate is threatened....' at the end makes me too sad. Anyone with any knowledge of the issue would point out that I didn't do myself any favors by coming to Cambodia, a country notorious for its high deforestation rates. Somehow, during my first visit, while I knew that Cambodia has been largely deforested, I had stars in my eyes. I told myself that the forests had been cleared long ago, and now what remained was protected. Sadly, that is not the case.
 |
| Recently clear-cut land. Ratanakiri province, Cambodia. |
We took a new road to Ratanakiri from Siem Reap, through Preah Vihear and Steung Treng provinces. Nearly the entire route, small islands of forest were surrounded by a sea of burnt stumps, symmetrical clear-cut tracks and rubber tree seedlings in perfect rows. Trucks loaded with massive logs routinely passed us. The dirt-floor roadside stall we ate lunch in served us on two-feet thick hardwood tables and regal-looking solid wood chairs. Every two kilometers, there was another ad for a Chinese earthworks machine company. It was the real-life inspiration for the deforestation illustrations in every middle school biology text book--the only thing missing was the stampede of scared animals in the other direction. I kept waiting and waiting for this nightmarish landscape to end (a coworker put on Michael Jackson's 'Earth Song' unprompted), and for the pristine Ratanakiri forests advertised to tourists to begin. But it never happened, and before I knew it, we were in Banlung, the provincial capital.
 |
| Rosewood chairs at a typical Khmer guesthouse. |
There are many factors pushing the (further) deforestation of Cambodia, as there are in any tropical country. The demand for timber is high at all levels of society: most Cambodians still cook their daily meals with wood or charcoal; any family with means has a set of those fancy wooden chairs, at a minimum. Additionally, illegal logging by both Cambodians and foreigners is a constant threat, as the global demand for timber and especially rosewood makes even a single tree extremely valuable. However, it is clear that in the northeast, the largest contributing factor is the awarding of large economic land concessions (known in Cambodia as ECLs) to rubber companies and other agribusinesses. These concessions are highly controversial and are being accused of infringing on local people's land rights as well. While they were formally halted last May, deals still in the process before the decry are still moving forward, and there is no public list of how many that includes.
The Phnom Penh Post, Cambodia Daily and others have reported extensively on these issues, and I'm certainly no expert. Cambodia needs development, especially in its agriculture sector, but this doesn't seem like the most sustainable way to be about doing so. While it may not offer much in the way of immediate pay-off, sustainably managing the few forests that remain seems like a better long term investment, from tourism, non-timber forest products, regulated logging, and sustained livelihoods for the people who depend directly on the forest. But I wonder if the livelihood of the people who depend on the forests are taken into account, or if then have a voice at the bargaining table. There has been some encouraging news
in recent weeks, but in many areas, the issue is
far from settled.