Cambodia’s economy is booming. But
is that growth despite its authoritarian political situation, or because of it?
Will rising standards of living lead to political freedoms, or is it the other
way around? A recent NYTimes op-ed forum asks how the US should treat emerging
economies with authoritarian leaders and poor human rights records. The
countries in question here are Rwanda and Ethiopia, but Cambodia would be
equally relevant, especially given President Obama’s highly publicized (at
least in Cambodia) recent trip to the country for the ASEAN summit, as well as
the American foreign policy ‘pivot’ towards Asia.
Human rights advocates have
suggested making future aid to Cambodia conditional on political reform, while
others have pushed to end aid money completely. But implementing either idea
opens the door even wider for China, which has no scruples about human rights. And
there are some that praise the Chinese model, which prioritizes infrastructure
improvements and business investment, claiming that economic development will
inevitably lead to greater transparency and a more empowered citizenry. After twenty-some years of aid with
limited success, it is certainly time to consider other options. But given the
land-grabbing controversies and the entrenched power of the well-connected
here, I wonder who stands to gain from ‘business investment’ in Cambodia. Anyone
who has spent time on Cambodia’s roadways has seen the trucks full of young
women being driven to and from ominous looking garment factories at odd hours.
Meanwhile, mansions in Phnom Penh get bigger and more elaborate with each
passing day.
And finally there are those that claim that Cambodia's 'growth' is an illusion: the rich are getting richer, foreign investors are making profits, but the general population is barely better off than it was during the UNTAC period. Another 'Room for Debate' discusses the recent conflict in the Congo, but I couldn't help but to think of Cambodia when one of the writers described land grabbing and opaque distribution of resource wealth as a key impediment to progress.





























